Gyanvapi, Hindu Temple!
Muslims claims led to survey of this fourth century temple, well documented evidence brings to light Muslim tyrants’ destruction Rohan Giri Gyanvapi complex situated within the Kashi Vishwanath Temple premises in India’s northern city Varanasi depicts historical connect to its 17th-century construction and subsequent demolition on the command of the Mughal tyrant, Aurangzeb. The aftermath of this demolition witnessed emergence of a new temple in the late 18th century, carefully erected adjacent to the original structure by Queen Ahilya Bai Holkar. Gyanvapi is a Sanskrit word that means “well of knowledge,” and it is mentioned in the Puranas (epics) as well. In the Linga Purana, it’s said that “देवस्य दक्षिणी भागे वापी तिष्ठती शोभना, तस्यास्त वोदकं पीत्वा पुनर्जन्म न विद्यते”. Loosely translated, it means, “There is a beautiful well in the southern part of the ancient Vishwanath temple, drinking water from the well leads to emancipation. Skanda Purana refers drinking the water of Gyanvapi brings enlightenment and liberation from sin.” Excerpt from “Skanda Purana” Gyanvapi structure adjacent to Kashi Vishwanath Temple has been at the centre of a legal debate in India and elsewhere. The legal battle intensified when five Hindu women filed a petition in Varanasi District Court seeking the right to worship Maa Shringar Gauri on the structure’s outer wall. This sparked a series of events leading to recent order of the court allowing Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to survey the place. After a lot of deliberation and adjournments, the High Court allowed the survey with a few riders. Timeline Little known facts about Gyanvyapi. S.No. Date/Period Details 1 4th–5th Century In Gupta period, Chandragupta 2, commonly known as Maharaja Vikramaditya, constructed Kashi Vishwanath temple. 2 635 AD A Chinese traveller Hsuan Tsang visited and wrote a lot that includes several references to Varanasi. He described Varanasi as a land of knowledge and temples. 3 1194–1197 The temple was largely destroyed following an order of Muhammad Ghori, setting off a series of demolitions and re-building throughout history. 4 1669 On Mughal invader Aurangzeb’s instruction, the Vishwanath temple was demolished and Gyanvapi mosque was built on the temple’s land. 5 1776-1778 Rani Ahilyabai Holkar of Indore restored the temple near Gyanvapi complex. 6 1822 James Prinsep (an English scholar, orientalist, and antiquary) illustrated the rear wall of Gyanvapi as the “temple of Vishveshvur.” Hindus worshipped plinth of the mosque as the plinth of old Kashi Vishwanath temple. 7 1829 British traveller Reginald Heber, in his book, “Narrative of a Journey Through the Upper Provinces of India from Calcutta to Bombay, 1824-1825” described how Aurangzeb had desecrated a holy Hindu spot & constructed mosque on it. He also stated that Hindus held water of Gyanvapi holier than the Ganges. 8 1936 British government was sued in district court for the right to offer namaz throughout the Gyanvapi complex. The claimants produced seven witnesses whereas the British government provided fifteen. 9 August 15, 1937 Right to offer Namaz was granted explicitly with the caveat that such prayers could not be offered anyplace else in the Gyanvapi complex. 10 April 10, 1942 The High Court dismissed an appeal to maintain the lower court’s verdict. 11 October 15, 1991 Pandit Somnath Vyas, Dr. Ramrang Sharma, and others filed a lawsuit in Varanasi court seeking construction of a new temple at Gyanvapi as well as freedom to worship. 12 1998 Two petitions were filed in the High Court on behalf of Anjuman Inazaniya Masajid and the UP Sunni Waqf Board Lucknow, challenging the order. 13 March 7, 2000 Pandit Somnath Vyas passed away. 14 October 11, 2018 Vijay Shankar Rastogi, a former district government advocate was appointed as plaintiff in this case. 15 2020 This plea further encouraged Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee to oppose the petition seeking an ASI survey of the entire Gyanvapi complex. 16 August 2021 Five female devotees filed a petition in the Varanasi District Court seeking permission to worship deities Hanuman, Nandi and Shringar Gauri inside the premises of Gyanvapi. 17 April 8, 2022 Following the petition filed in August 2021, an order was issued by Varanasi District Court to conduct a survey by Archaeological Survey of India 18 April 14, 2022 The survey was launched for two days. 19 November 2022 The supreme court of India agreed to set up a bench to hear the case. 20 May 12, 2023 Allahabad High Court ordered determination of the age of Shivling using modern technology. 21 July 21, 2023 Varanasi district court directs ASI to conduct the survey — including excavations, wherever necessary — to determine if the mosque was built at a place where a temple existed earlier. 22 July 24, 2023 Supreme Court of India halts ASI’s survey at premises till 5 pm on July 26, asks HC to hear the mosque panel’s plea. 23 July 27, 2023 Allahabad High Court reserved its order, and extended the stay on the ASI’s survey until August 3. 24 August 3, 2023 Allahabad HC allows scientific survey of Gyanvapi premises “in the interest of justice”. 25 August 4, 2023 Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee moves Supreme Court challenging the Allahabad HC order that refused to stay the Varanasi court’s direction for a scientific survey. 26 August 4, 2023 Supreme Court of India refused to stay the ASI survey of the Gyanvapi structure, except the ‘wuzu khana’ area where a ‘shivling’ was claimed to have been found last year. Survey is underway. The Quest for Truth and Worship Following Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ravi Kumar Diwarkar’s directive to survey the Gyanvapi premises and the subsequent appointment of Ajay Kumar Mishra as the advocate commissioner, Advocate Mishra initiated the inspection on May 6, 2022, focusing on the exterior of the structure. Nonetheless, the survey was suspended following a complaint filed by Anjuman Intezamia Masjid (AIM) in court. AIM contended that the advocate commissioner lacked the authority to capture footage within the premises. AIM seeks a modification in Mishra’s role as Advocate Commissioner. But why did Civil Judge Ravi Kumar Diwakar order the survey? In