CIHS

Date/Time:

Blog Post

CIHS > Canada > Guardians or Bystanders!

Guardians or Bystanders!

Canadian police remain mute spectators to violence and vandalism unleashed in Hindu temples by Khalistani extremists backed by Trudeau.

Rahul Pawa

On a quiet Diwali weekend, two temples in Canada, long-standing beacons of peace for Hindu diaspora became flashpoints of violence. In Brampton, at Hindu Sabha Mandir where a towering 55-foot statue of Lord Hanuman stands in majestic repose, sanctity of worship was violently interrupted.  In Surrey, around same time, similar desecration played out but with an unsettling twist: Canadian police, rather than offering protection from violence, reportedly turned their back on the very devotees they are sworn to safeguard.

This spiraling saga of aggression against Canada’s Hindu community speaks of growing dissonance, one in which Anti-hindu allegiances and violent extremist ideology have found combustible alignment. These events call into question not Canadian authorities role in preserving peace and apparent lack of justice in face of rising extremism against Hindus. The incidents bear markings of a broader issue that Canada under the guise of neutrality may have dangerously fueled.

Hindu Sabha Mandir in Brampton stands as a symbol of spiritual and cultural unity for Hindu community with its towering Hanuman statue —serving as proud reminder of ancient heritage in Canadian landscape. Yet, as Indian consular officials visited the temple to offer routine services, scenes of unrest unfolded that shattered the temple’s tranquility. Khalistani extremists, aligned with banned Sikhs for Justice extremist group, staged a violent protest that devolved into open aggression against temple-goers.

Video footage shared across social media captures harrowing moments as Hindu devotees were set upon, beaten, and confronted with huge sticks by extremists. Aggressive violence by these extremists was unprovoked assault on peaceful community engaged in their sacred observances. Sikhs for Justice, a group with known links to Pakistan and history of terrorism linked to violent Khalistan secessionist movement had explicitly voiced their desire to disrupt consular services outside official premises, claiming these events posed a “threat” to Khalistani cause.

Peel Regional Police, responsible for overseeing law enforcement in Brampton, have faced sharp criticism for their response or lack of it. Widespread violence notwithstanding, no arrests were made, a decision that many say reflects a worrisome leniency. Peel Police released a brief statement pledging to “investigate any acts of violence or threats,” yet to date, no charges have been filed. This inaction starkly contrasts with the force’s rapid response to similar instances of disorderly conduct in other communities.

For Hindu Canadians, these events highlight troubling trend. Liberal MP Chandra Arya condemned the incident, calling attention to what he described as “free pass” given to Canadian Khalistani extremists. As he noted, “These extremists receive a degree of immunity that raises serious questions about Canada’s commitment to protecting its citizens equally.”

Across the country in Surrey, a gathering of Hindu devotees at a temple similarly faced intimidation from Khalistani extremists operating with impunity in Canada. As people of all ages congregated to pray, the Khalistanis arrived with charged slogans, invoking Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a notorious Khalistani extremist recently slain under murky circumstances. Far from remaining a peaceful protest, the event quickly turned menacing, with calls for Hindus to “go back to their country.”

Yet what unfolded next is perhaps more disturbing than the protest itself. As tensions escalated, members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) intervened—but not to protect the threatened Hindu worshippers. Instead, in an act that has left the Hindu community in shock and disbelief, RCMP detained three Hindu devotees who were then escorted from temple grounds in full view of the protestors who had incited the incident. The reason for these detentions remains undisclosed, but the message it sent was clear: the victims of intimidation were cast as the culprits.

This police action has left many questioning the RCMP’s impartiality. At a time when Hindus in Canada felt increasingly vulnerable, police response was inadequate or complicit. The pattern of law enforcement intervening against Hindu Canadians, rather than protecting them, has fostered deep resentment and fear. A local temple spokesperson pleaded for calm, reminding the community to await further information but the undercurrent of fear was palpable. Canadian authorities’ seeming unwillingness to protect Hindus or even acknowledge the intimidation they face revealed a chasm in the justice system they are meant to trust.

Indian High Commission in Ottawa released a statement expressing disappointment at the violence allowed to mar routine consular events. “As in previous years,” the statement read, “the High Commission and Consulates General of India have planned consular camps during this period to assist local life certificate beneficiaries.” However, despite clear forewarning and requests for heightened security, Canadian authorities failed to prevent Khalistani disruption. This dereliction of duty has left Hindus in Canada and beyond questioning the nation’s dedication to ensuring safety for all religious communities.

Diplomatic tensions sparked by Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau between Canada and India have simmered in recent months, with baseless accusations fueling discord. Yet Canada’s handling of these incidents hints at something more insidious— normalization of extremism under the guise of free speech. It appears that Canada is struggling, or perhaps choosing not to confront, a deeply ingrained bias in its approach to law enforcement where Khalistani sympathisers were concerned. India’s high commission has been left with few choices but to remind Canadian authorities of their duty to protect citizens and consular staff engaged in routine activities. The community they represent, however, feels abandoned, exposed to aggression with no recourse to justice.

As Canada’s Hindu diaspora reflects on these violent episodes, an unsettling reality emerges: their homeland may be an ocean away, but the conflicts it faces seem to have followed them to Canadian shores. Devotees who once sought refuge in Canada, a country that promised peace and safety, now find themselves targeted, harassed, and abandoned by a system that seems unwilling to defend their rights. In these attacks, there is bitter irony—Canada’s celebrated multiculturalism, once source of pride, has been weaponised against the very people it claimed to protect. As Canadian authorities continue to walk the line between neutrality and negligence, Hindu Canadians were left wondering whether their place in this country is as secure as they once believed.

While the events at the Hindu Sabha Mandir in Brampton and the Surrey temple may appear isolated to some, for Canada’s Hindu community, they signify a deeply entrenched, systemic assault—one that has been endured for too long and has now led to profound breakdown in trust. These incidents are part of an alarming trend across Canada, where Hindu temples have increasingly become targets of intimidation, vandalism, and violence. In January 2023, the Swaminarayan Temple in Toronto was defaced with anti-India and pro-Khalistan graffiti, marking one of the earliest signs of targeted harassment.

Just a few months later, in February 2023, Gauri Shankar Temple in Brampton suffered a similar attack, with vandals leaving hateful messages that many in the community saw as a direct threat. In July 2023, the Bhagavad Gita Park in Brampton—a public space created to celebrate Hindu heritage—was desecrated with anti-Hindu and anti-India slogans. Each incident has added to a growing sense of insecurity among Canada’s Hindu population, with places of worship—once havens of peace—becoming symbols of vulnerability. This ongoing pattern of attacks, alongside perceived police inaction or complicity, has eroded the community’s trust and calls into question Canada’s commitment to upholding the safety and rights of all its citizens equally. As one Hindu worshipper poignantly remarked, “We came to Canada to live in peace, but our children are being threatened, and our temple has been defaced. This is not the Canada we imagined.”

In failing to hold violent Khalistani extremists accountable, Canada’s authorities have sent a chilling message: intimidation and violence against Hindus is tolerable if done under the guise of dissent and freedom of expression. Canada’s promise of pluralism and protection now hangs in the balance. When the Hindu community looks to law enforcement for safety, it should not have to question whether the police will act as protectors or passive bystanders. The fear growing within the community is that, in the face of extremist agendas, the police have begun to mistake neutrality for inaction, and tolerance for complicity.

The question is no longer whether the Canadian police can keep the peace, but whether they will choose to. As temples are turned into flashpoints and faithful communities grapple with a security that seems less assured by the day, Canada faces a reckoning: will it stand by its commitment to protect all its citizens equally, or will it allow bias, silence, and neglect to sow further division? For the Hindu community, the message is as stark as it is painful. In a country that once held itself up as a beacon of peace and inclusion, the guardians of law and order must decide whether they will defend these ideals—or become bystanders to their erosion.

(Author is Research Director at New Delhi based non-partisan think tank, Centre for Integrated and Holistic Studies)

About The Author

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *